The impact of extent of mitral valve stenosis on the short and long-term outcome of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2013.19.003
- VernacularTitle:二尖瓣狭窄程度对经皮穿刺球囊二尖瓣成形术近远期疗效的影响
- Author:
Zhe ZHANG
;
Yan WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Mitral valve annuloplasty;
Mitral valve stenosis;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2013;(19):7-10
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the impact of extent of mitral valve stenosis on the short and longterm outcome of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) in patients with mitral valve stenosis.Methods Two hundred and eighty-four patients with mitral valve stenosis were divided into two groups according to the Wilkins scoring system,and 191 cases whose score ≤8 were classified as group A,while the rest were classified as group B.All the patients were using the modified Inoue balloon method.Patients of successful PBMV were followed up at least 48 months and the efficiency was compared between two groups.Results The success rate of PBMV was 97.9％(187/191) and 92.5％(86/93) in group A and group B,there was significant difference between two groups (P ＜ 0.05).Echocardiography parameters improved significantly in both groups at 6 months after PBMV compared with those before PBMV (P＜ 0.05).Compared with those in group A,the changes of left atrial mean pressure [(14.31 ± 4.79) mm Hg (1 mm Hg =0.133 kPa) vs.(15.42 ± 5.14) mm Hg],across the valve pressure difference [(9.18 ± 4.66) mm Hg vs.(10.21 ± 4.38)mm Hg],pulmonary arterial systolic pressure [(26.21 ± 8.76) mm Hg vs.(32.04 ± 9.58) mm Hg],mitral valve orifice area [(1.01 ±0.16) cm2 vs.(1.21 ±0.18) cm2] after PBMV in group B were less (P＜0.05).Long-term follow-up (48-92 months) was completed in 273 successful cases and echocardiography parameters after PBMV improved significantly in both groups compared with those before PBMV during follow-up (P＜ 0.05).Compared with those in group A,the changes of left atrial mean pressure [(12.91 ±5.00) mm Hg vs.(15.1 7 ± 5.14) mm Hg],across the valve pressure difference [(7.26 ± 4.58) mm Hg vs.(9.63 ± 4.22) mm Hg],pulmonary arterial systolic pressure [(20.54 ± 7.68) mm Hg vs.(29.11 ± 8.53)mm Hg],mitral valve orifice area [(0.92 ±0.15) cm2 vs.(1.09 ±0.18) cm2] after PBMV in group B were less (P＜ 0.05).The incidence of mitral restenosis was also significantly higher in group B than that in group A [19.8％(17/86) vs.8.0％(15/187)],and there was significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions The extent of mitral valve stenosis plays a key role on the outcome of PBMV in patients with mitral valve stenosis.Patients with lower echocardiography scores benefit more from PBMV than patients with higher echocardiography scores.
