Analysis of the delivery mode results of repregnancy after cesarean section
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2013.11.015
- VernacularTitle:剖宫产后再次妊娠分娩方式的结果分析
- Author:
Yan WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Caesarean section;
Pregnancy;
Parturition
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2013;20(11):1634-1636
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the best choice mode of repregnancy after cesarean section.Methods 312 cases with repregnancy after cesarean section were divided into the repeat cesarean section (RCS) group (210 cases),vaginal birth after cesarean(VBAC) group (102 cases),and the first time cesarean(PCS)group(210 cases).The maternity delivery mode and outcome were observed and the relevant conditions (postpartum hemorrhage,the average length of hospital stay and hospital costs,etc.) were compared among the three groups.Results The trial production was in 144 cases,and vaginal delivery in 102 cases,the success rate was 70.83％.168 cases with direct vaginal delivery,the success rate was 53.85％.The postpartum hemorrhage of RCS group[(310.5 ± 30.2)ml] was significantly higher than that of VBAC group [(143.5 ± 25.2) ml] (U =7.55,P ＜ 0.01) and PCS group [(244.2 ± 28.3) ml] (U =20.4,P ＜ 0.05).The hospital stay time of RCS group [(7.5 ± 0.2) d] was significantly more than that of VBAC group[(3.0 ±0.3)d] (U =25.50,P ＜0.01)and PCS group[(6.6 ±0.6)d] (U=16.7,P ＜0.05).The hospitalization costs of RCS group [(4 451.5 ± 62.4) yuan] was significantly higher than that of VBAC group [(1 223.6±12.3)yuan](U=71.5,P＜0.01) and PCS group[(3 756.4± 54.6)d](U=25.2,P＜0.01).Conclusion Repregnancy after cesarean section is not absolute indications for cesarean section,vaginal birth is safe and feasible as long as the medical intensive care effectively,and it can reduce the rate of cesarean section.
