Student's Response to Current Lecture Evaluation Method in One Medical School.
- Author:
Seok Gun PARK
1
;
Dae Hyun SEO
;
Su Yeon SEO
;
Young Seung SEO
;
Seung Kwan SONG
;
Kyung Hwang SHIN
Author Information
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dankook University Medical College, Cheonan, Korea. seokgun@hitel.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Lecture;
Evaluation;
Integrated curriculum
- MeSH:
Curriculum;
Humans;
Lectures;
Schools, Medical*
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Education
2003;15(3):233-240
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The evaluation of a lecture by students is one of the good way to improve a lecture. In one medical school, we started one-year-integrated-lecture curriculum for sophomore. And we evaluated lectures using formal lecture evaluation sheet after completion of each integrated lectures. The results were fed back to lecturers. But lecturers were indifferent to the results. So we performed this study to evaluate the current lecture evaluation method. METHODS: Answering patterns of evaluation sheets were reviewed. 50 students entitled to integrated lectures were given structured questions. 44 of them recovered. And randomly selected 10 students were interviewed. RESULTS: Analysis of evaluation sheets showed that some students checked the items just for fun. More than half of the students answered that they did not check the questions seriously. Reasons why the evaluation of lectures were not going well were; students were not trained to evaluate something; evaluation sheet was not designed to evaluate individual lecturer; listed items were too many in number and inappropriate; some students were suspicious about the impact of evaluation of lectures. In addition to this, it was revealed that students thought the timing of evaluation of lecture was important, too. CONCLUSION: Indifference of lecturers to the results is one form of resistance to the evaluation of lectures by students. To make evaluation of lectures effective, numbers and contents of evaluation items must be selected carefully, students need to be trained, and adequate evaluation timing should be determined with frequent feed backs.
