Quality Assurance of Patients for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
- Author:
Sang Min YOON
1
;
Byong Yong YI
;
Eun Kyung CHOI
;
Jong Hoon KIM
;
Seung Do AHN
;
Sang Wook LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Intensity modulated radiation therapy;
Quality assurance
- MeSH:
Film Dosimetry;
Humans
- From:The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
2002;20(1):81-90
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To establish and verify the proper and the practical IMRT (Intensity-modulated radiation therapy) patient QA (Quality Assurance). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IMRT QA which consists of 3 steps and 16 items were designed and examined the validity of the program by applying to 9 patients, 12 IMRT cases of various sites. The three step QA program consists of RTP related QA, treatment information flow QA, and a treatment delivery QA procedure. The evaluation of organ constraints, the validity of the point dose, and the dose distribution are major issues in the RTP related QA procedure. The leaf sequence file generation, the evaluation of the MLC control file, the comparison of the dry run film, and the IMRT field simulate image were included in the treatment information flow procedure QA. The patient setup QA, the verification of the IMRT treatment fields to the patients, and the examination of the data in the Record & Verify system make up the treatment delivery QA procedure. RESULTS: The point dose measurement results of 10 cases showed good agreement with the RTP calculation within 3%. One case showed more than a 3% difference and the other case showed more than 5%, which was out side the tolerance level. We could not find any differences of more than 2 mm between the RTP leaf sequence and the dry run film. Film dosimetry and the dose distribution from the phantom plan showed the same tendency, but quantitative analysis was not possible because of the film dosimetry nature. No error had been found from the MLC control file and one mis-registration case was found before treatment. CONCLUSION: This study shows the usefulness and the necessity of the IMRT patient QA program. The whole procedure of this program should be performed, especially by institutions that have just started to accumulate experience. But, the program is too complex and time consuming. Therefore, we propose practical and essential QA items for institutions in which the IMRT is performed as a routine procedure.
