Comparison of the effect of two methods in the treatment for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2013.07.014
- VernacularTitle:两种抽吸血肿法治疗高血压脑出血的疗效比较
- Author:
Shaochun LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Intracranial hemorrhage,hypertensive;
Suction;
Craniotomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2013;20(7):994-996
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect of minimally puncture aspiration therapy with cranial awl hole aspiration thereapy for hypertension cerebral hemorrhage.Methods Sixty-two people were divided into two groups at random:minimally puncture aspiration therapy was used to treat 31 patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage,minimally puncture aspiration therapy was guided by CT with YL-1 minimally puncture needle.Cranial awl hole aspiration thereapy was used to 31 patients and was guided by CT.Results The intracranial hemorrage secondary rate was 12.9％,hematoma removal rate was 81.0％.After 3 months of treatment,light defect with neural function was 16 cases(51.6％),severe neurological deficits was 3 cases(9.6％)and moderate defect was 8 cases(25.8％).The intracranial hemorrage secondary rate was 16.1％,hematoma remowal rate was 82.6％,After 3 months of treatment,light defect with neural function was 15 cases(48.4％),severe neurological deficits was 4 cases(12.9％)and moderate defect was 8 cases (25.8％).The hematoma removal rate of minimally puncture aspiration thereapy was similar to cranial awl hole aspiration thereapy,while the intracranial hemorrage secondary rate was lower (x2 =0.412,P =0.324).Conclusion The neural function defence score showed no significant differences.And it' s suitful for patients with poor tolerance.
