The efficacy comparison of insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine intensive treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetes
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2013.07.012
- VernacularTitle:门冬胰岛素30与甘精胰岛素强化治疗2型糖尿病的疗效比较
- Author:
Zhaoliang LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus,type 2;
Insulin,long-acting;
Recombinant proteins;
Injections,subcutaneous
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2013;20(7):988-990
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare efficacy of different insulin intensive treatment in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,to provide a reference for the programming of intensive treatment of diabetes.Methods 60 type 2 diabetes patients met inclusion criteria were divided into insulin aspart 30 intensive treatment group (I group) and insulin glargine intensive treatment group(Ⅱ group) by random number table,30 cases of each group,I group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin aspart 30,tid,Ⅱ group was given subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine at bedtime,qd.Both groups were treated for 14d,record the time of blood glucose control,observed the occurrence of low blood sugar,detected the HOMA-IR,HOMA-β and clinical efficacy.Results After treatment,the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β of Ⅰ group and Ⅱ group were (6.0 ± 0.9)mmol/L vs (5.4 ±1.1)mmol/L,(7.4 ± 1.9)mmol/L vs (6.6±2.3)mmol/L,(6.2 ± 1.7)％ vs (6.0 ± 1.9)％,(1.11 ±0.32) vs (1.01 ±0.35),(5.23 ± 1.63) vs (5.46 ±1.41),the fasting glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group after treatment compared with those before treatment,the differences were statistically significant.The HOMA-β of Ⅰ and Ⅱ group was significantly higher than that before treatment,the difference was statistically significant.The fasting blood glucose,2h postprandial blood glucose,glycosylated hemoglobin,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β before and after treatment between two groups was not significantly different,the time of blood glucose control between Ⅰ and Ⅱ group were (6.5 ± 2.8) d vs (6.2 ± 2.5) d,the difference was not statistically significant,the low blood sugar of Ⅰ and group Ⅱ was 20％ (6/30) vs 3％ (1/30),there was statistically significant difference.Conclusion The insulin aspart 30 and insulin glargine intensive treatment all can control blood sugar,increase insulin β-cell function,reduce insulin resistance in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,but insulin glargine significantly reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia and insulin glargine is the ideal insulin for blood glucose security control.
