Comparison of ambulatory and conventional urodynamics in females with stress urinary incontinence
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2013.02.010
- VernacularTitle:动态尿动力学与常规尿动力学检查评估女性压力性尿失禁的对比研究
- Author:
Jianguo WEN
;
Wen ZHU
;
Li YANG
;
Lingang CUI
;
Xiaoping SHANG
;
Ruili ZHANG
;
Jinsheng LI
;
Chenxu HUANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Urodynamics;
Ambulatory urodynamics monitoring;
Urinary incontinence,stress;
Urinary bladder,overactive;
Female
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2013;(2):116-119
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the application of ambulatory urodynamic(AUM)and conventional urodynamic(CUD)in detecting stress urinary incontinence(SUI)and detrusor overactivity(DO)in females.Methods Incontinence questionnaire short form(ICI-Q-SF),CUD and AUM were administrated on 30 female patients with the mean age of 49.4(32-63)years.The duration of symptom was 4.7 (1-9)years.The patients were divided into 3 groups of mild(n =9),moderate(n =15)and severe (n =6)according to ICI-Q-SF.Three micturition cycles were recorded during AUM.Results SUI and DO detected by AUM were 90％ and 37％,significantly more than those by CUD of 70％ and 10％(P ＜0.05).Twenty-one moderate and severe SUI patients diagnosed by ICI-Q-SF,detected by AUM and CUD simultaneously showed that abdominal leak point pressure(ALPP)and voided volume were lower,and detrusor pressure was higher recorded by AUM than those by CUD significantly(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions SUI and DO are easier detected by AUM than by CUD.AUM is a useful additional tool in clinical practice for those patients CUD failed to explain their symptoms.
