The contrast of clinical efficacy of two different guide wire in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2012.34.009
- VernacularTitle:两种不同导丝在经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中的临床疗效对比
- Author:
Qingli QIN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cholangiopancreatography,endoscopic retrograde;
Loach guide wire;
Zebra guide wire
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2012;(34):26-28
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the comparison of two different guide wire in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Methods One hundred and twenty-four patients who were identified with ERCP indications were divided into the loach guide wire group (group A) and zebra guide wire group (group B) by random digits table,each with 62 cases.Intubation time,rate of successful intubation and postoperative complication was compared.Results The rate of of one-time successful intubation in group A was 95.2％(59/62),significantly higher than that in group B [82.3％(51/62)] (P ＜0.05).The average time of one-time successful intubation in group A was (1.38 ± 0.52) min,significantly lower than that in group B [(1.63 ± 0.61) min] (P ＜ 0.05).The rate of total successful intubation in group A was 95.2％(59/62),in group B was 96.8％(60/62),there was no significant difference (P＞ 0.05).The rate of postoperative hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis in group A was 12.9％ (8/62),in group B was 32.3％ (20/62),there was significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion The application of the loach guide wire in ERCP operation is significantly better than that of the zebra guide.
