Comparative analysis of double-blind review and open review of Ph.D candidates' thesis

VernacularTitle:医学科学博士学位论文双盲评阅与公开评阅结果的对比分析
Author: Shujing LIANG ; Hong CHEN ; Qinghuan ZHOU ; Lin QU ; Siqin ZHANG
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: Ph.D candidates' dissertation; Double-blind review; Open review
From: Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management 2012;25(4):262-264
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Improvement of the review of dissertation for doctoral degree is important for the training of qualified doctors.Current practice includes double-blind review and open review.This paper compares and analyses the outcome of the two kinds of reviews and found that double-blind review is more objective that the other(the mean of open review score is 96.39±2.069,the mean of double-blind review score is 85.18±6.635.P=0.001,P＜0.01).In the end some suggestions are proposed to improve the double-blind review system.