Comparison of repair distal soft tissue defect with two kind of reverse digital artery island flaps
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2012.02.016
- VernacularTitle:两种手指逆行岛状皮瓣修复指远节软组织缺损的疗效比较
- Author:
Shirong LU
;
Xiaolin QIN
;
Jian ZHAO
;
Lei WANG
;
Wei WEI
;
Yang ZHAO
;
Guanghong WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Homodigital flap;
Cross finger flap;
Island flaps;
Finger;
Microsurgery
- From:
Chinese Journal of Microsurgery
2012;35(2):132-134
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analysis the clinic outcome(similarities & differences, indication and caution)of repairing fingertip soft tissue defect with two kind of reverse digital artery island flaps with the palmar cutaneous branch of proper digital nerve.MethodsFrom January 2000 to Auguest 2008, all 500cases (514 fingers) were repaired with reverse homodigital artery island flap (263 fingers of 250 cases) and reverse cross finger digital artery island flap(251 fingers of 250 cases).All cases were followed up from 3-8years,compared with flap range,finger extension,sensory rehabilitation,et al. ResultsAll flaps (A & Bgroup) of 500 cases (514 fingers) survived.According to flap range,cross finger flap was better than homodigital flap (P ＜ 0.05); according to finger extension,homodigital flap better than cross finger flap (P ＜0.05); according to sensory rehabilitation,homodigital flap little better than cross finger flap(P ＜ 0.05); according to long-term follow-up, all had no obviously different (P ＞ 0.05).ConclusionHomodigital flap can cover distal soft tissue defect less than 2.0 cm× 2.5 cm, cross finger flap is a better choice for more than 2.0cm×3.0cm of distal soft tissue defect. According to the flap cover area, cross finger flap is first choice,and to finger extension & sensory rehabilitation,homodigital flap is first choice; accoding to finger movements,two kinds of flaps are all good choice.
