Dosimetric differences among RapidArc plans based on different target volumes in radiotherapy of hepatocelluar carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2012.03.017
- VernacularTitle:RapidArc进行肝癌放疗时不同靶区确定方法的剂量学比较
- Author:
Guanzhong GONG
;
Yong YIN
;
Tonghai LIU
;
Jinhu CHEN
;
Jinlong SONG
;
Jie LU
;
Changsheng MA
;
Tao SUN
;
Tong BAI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hepatocelluar carcinoma;
Radiotherapy;
Intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy;
Dosimetry
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2012;32(3):289-293
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Purpose To investigate the dosimetric differences among RapidArc (RA) plans which were designed on different target volumes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods A total of 10 HCC patients underwent 3D-CT scan under free breathing ( FB),end inspiration hold ( EIH ) associated with active breath coordinator (ABC) and 4D-CT scan.The 4D-CT were sorted into 10 sets of CT images according to respiratory cycle.The gross tumor volume (GTV) was manually contoured on different CT images.The individual internal gross target volume ( IGTV1 ) was obtained from 4D-CT,and the individual margins from GTVFB to IGTV1.IGTV2 were obtained from GTVFB using individual margins.The planned target volumes (PTV-1,PTV-2,PTV-3 and PTV-4 ) were obtained from GTVFB,IGTV1,IGTV2 and GTVEIA applying different margins.The RA plans (RA1,RA2,RA3 and RA4 ) were designed from different PTVs,and for RA1,RA2 and RA3 the simple 358° arc were used,while three 135° arcs were used for RA4.The dosimetric differences were compared.Results The PTV-1 and PTV-3 were larger than PTV-2 and PTV-4; the mean values of PtV-1/PTV-2 and PTV-1/PTV-4 were 2.5 and 1.9,respectively.There were no significant differences in conformal index,homogeneity index,maximum dose,and minimum dose of PTV among 4 RA plans.The irradiation dose of normal liver of RA3 and RA4 were 8.23 Gy and 7.63 Gy respectively,both significantly lower than those of RA1 and RA2 (10.21 Gy,9.62 Gy,x2 =10.68,P ＜0.05 ),and the V30of RA3 and RA4 were 5.24％ and 5.05％ respectively,both significantly lower than those of RA1 and RA2 (7.76％,6.12％,x2 =14.76,P ＜ 0.05 ).There were no significant differences in irradiation doses of stomach and duodenum among different plans.Conclusions Using 4D-CT or ABC technology with RapidArc in HCC can define the target volume accurately and achieve prefect dose distribution sparing more normal liver volume,compared to the traditional margins.4D-CT and ABC play similar roles in sparing normal liver.
