Effect of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2012.07.026
- VernacularTitle:机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性膀胱切除-尿流改道术有效性评价
- Author:
Zhonghui LI
;
Yulong XU
;
Lian ZOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Robotic-assisted;
Laparoscopy;
Urinary diversion;
Bladder cancer
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2012;28(7):749-753
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To assess the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystcctomy and urinary diversion in the treatment of bladder cancer.Methods We collected the clinical data of one patient with bladder cancer who underwent RCRA with ileal neobladder from the Second Artillery General Hospital in Beijing on March,2010.Literature on this topic was analyzed.Results ( 1 ) Tbc operation duration of this procedure was 540 mins.The intra-operative blood loss was 200 ml,and no blood transfusion was needed.Postoperative pathologic examination indicated low-grade infiltrative urothelial carcinoma.The patient exhausted on the 3th post-operative day,had off-bed activities on the 4th post-operative day,and was discharged on the 28th post-operative day.(2) There were more than 400 patients underwent RARC worldwide.The RARC group had marginally lower complications rate (31％ vs.28％ ) and numbers of lymph node dissection ( 18.2 vs.13.0) than the LCR group.There were significant differences in the duration of operation (285.7 mins vs.372.0 mins),intraoperatie blood loss ( 286 ml vs.556.0 ml) and mean days of hospitalization ( 8.6 d vs.13.0 d) between the RARCA and the LCR groups.Conclusion RARC is a novel and effective procedure for the treatment of bladder cancer.As there is only a relatively small sample around the world and little experience on this procedure can be referred,more clinical practice with RARC and high quality research with long-term follow-up are needed to update the database and evaluate its effectiveness and safety.
