Comparison study between qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differential diagnosis of breast masses
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2012.06.013
- VernacularTitle:超声造影定性与定量分析鉴别乳腺肿块的对比研究
- Author:
Shaoyu AN
;
Jian LIU
;
Yanchun GAO
;
Xiaobo ZHAO
;
Lingmi HOU
;
Ting XIE
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography;
Microbubbles;
Breast neoplasm
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2012;21(6):492-495
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo assess the diagnosis ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)between qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis in breast masses.Methods The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imagings of 73 cases breast masses (41malignant cases,32 benign cases) were analysed retrospectively,including qualitative indexes(obtained by eyes-watching method) and quantitative indexes (obtained by time-intensity curve).The relationship between these CEUS signs and pathology were evaluated by single variety and multiple variety analysis.The two logistic models on the basis of CEUS signs were obtained.According to the logistic regression results to create new variants pre-1 and pre-2,the two receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to assess the performance of the logistic models.ResultsBy qualitative analysis,the lesion enhanced features,lesion diameter expanding or not and the grades of lesion enhancement at the peak time entered the logistic regression.And the prediction accuracy to differential diagnosis the breast masses was 91.8％ and the area under the ROC was 91.3％.However,by quantitative analysis,only the relative peak intensity entered the regression,the prediction accuracy was 61.5 ％ and the area under the ROC was 75.7 ％.According to Z test,the areas difference under the two ROCs had statistically significant ( P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions To differential diagnosis the breast masses by CEUS,the qualitative indexes have more useful than the quantitative indexes.
