Clinical control study on Mirizzi syndrome treatment between laparoscopic operation and laparotomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2012.05.001
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗Mirizzi综合征的临床对照研究
- Author:
Jun GONG
;
Xiaojiong YU
;
Ke DONG
;
Ergang WEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Case-control studies;
Cholecystolithiasis;
Cholecystectomy;
Laparoscopes;
Mirizzi syndrome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2012;35(5):1-3
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages between laparoscopic operation and laparotomy in the treatment of Mirizzi syndrome.MethodsThe clinical data of 67 cases with Mirizzi syndrome were analyzed retrospectively from January 2008 to June 2011.Thirty-five cases were treated with laparoscopic operation(laparoscopic operation group),type Ⅰ in 24 cases,type Ⅱ in 11 cases,3 cases with conversion to laparotomy were rejected (type Ⅱ in 8 cases really).Thirty-five cases were treated with laparotomy(laparotomy group),type Ⅰ in 20 cases,type Ⅱ in 15 cases.The operation time,blood loss duringoperation,intake time of food,postoperative complications and hospital stay were compared between two groups.ResultsThe operation time was (53.2 ± 21.5) min,blood loss during operation was (23.2 ± 21.5)ml,intake time of food was 6 h,postoperative complications were with 3 cases (9.4％,3/32),hospital stay was(5.4 ±2.3) d in laparoscopic operation group.The operation time was(98.7 ± 17.2) min,blood loss during operation was ( 113.4 ± 31.6) ml,intake time of food was (46.8 ± 12.4) h,postoperative complications were with 5 cases( 14.3％,5/35 ),hospital stay was ( 11.3 ± 2.7) d in laparotomy group.Except for postoperative complications,there were significant differences in the operation time,blood loss during operation,intake time of food and hospital stay between two groups(P＜0.05).ConclusionsLaparoscopic operation is safe and feasible in treating type Ⅰ and most type Ⅱ Mirizzi syndrome.It has more advantages than laparotomy.
