Study on the best drug compatibility for the double-lumen endobronchial intubation anesthesia
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2011.07.012
- VernacularTitle:不同药物配伍用于双腔支气管插管全麻诱导的临床研究
- Author:
Chunling SU
;
Xiaoyan CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Anesthetics/AD;
Fentanyl/AD;
Sufentanil/AD;
Anesthesia,general;
Intubation,intratracheal/MT
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2011;13(7):906-908
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Study on the best drug compatibility for the double-lumen endobronchial intubation anesthesia. Methods Eighty ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ patients undergoing selective thoracis surgery requiring intubation with double-lumen tubes were randomly divided into A and B group, with 40 cases in each group.The systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), were recorded before induction (T0) , after drug injection (T1), during intubation (T2), and at 1 min (T3), 3 min (T4)and 5 min (T5) after intubation. Results There was no significant difference in SBP, DBP and HR between the two groups at T0[(124. 9 ± 16. 0) mmHg vs (125.8 ±6. 4) mmHg, (73. 1 ±9. 9)mmHg vs (74. 3± 10. 4) mmHg, (81.8 ± 6. 6) times/min vs (82. 4 ± 8. 1) times/min] (P ＞ 0. 05). Compared with parameter at T0, SBP, DBP and HR, parameters in two groups in T1 were all significantly decreased after anesthesia [(94. 8 ± 10. 03) mmHg vs (96. 9 ± 10. 1) mmHg, (57. 3 ± 7. 66) mmHg vs (55.4 ± 7. 03) mmHg,(69. 6 ± 7. 43) times/min vs (66. 3 ± 7. 03) times/min] (P ＜ 0. 05). The cardiovascular parameters at T0,T2, T3, T4 were all comparable with those in group B [SBP: (130 ± 11.6) mmHg, (125.6 ± 10. 43) mmHg,(120. 1 ± 12. 3)mmHg,(116. 8± 11.4)mmHg;DBP:(75.6 ±9. 12)mmHg,(76. 2 ±9. 8)mmHg,(73. 1 ±9. 2) mmHg, (71.6 ± 8.46) mmHg; HR: (88 ± 9. 12) times/min, (82. 9 ± 7.5) times/min, (81.9 ± 8.2)times/min, (79. 9 ± 7. 8) times/min] (P ＞ 0. 05) , which were significantly higher than those in group A [SBP: (146. 3 ± 14. 2) mmHg, (141.2 ± 10. 63) mmHg, (137. 2 ± 13.23) mmHg, (122. 9 ± 11.6) mmHg;DBP: (94. 9 ± 10. 6) mmHg, (84 ± 9.63) mmHg, (79. 9 ± 9) mmHg, (75.8 ± 8. 3) mmHg; HR: (102 ±10. 63) times/min, (97.6 ± 9. 23) times/min, (87. 7 ± 8. 2) times/min, (82. 1 ± 7.32) times/min] (P ＜0. 05). The parameters at T2, T3, T4 in group A were obviously higher than those group B (P ＜ 0. 05).Conclusions Cardiovascular response with double-lumen endobronchial intubation by sufentanil-induced was stronger than fentaty, sufentanil had more stable hemodynamic parameters and it worth to be usd in clinic.
