Technical difficulties and avoidance of complications in delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2011.10.008
- VernacularTitle:急性胆囊炎“延期”腹腔镜胆囊切除的手术技巧及并发症预防
- Author:
Bin ZHU
;
Zhanzhi ZHANG
;
Nengwei ZHANG
;
Ke GONG
;
Yiping LU
;
Buhe AMIN
;
Kai LI
;
Tongsheng WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
Acute cholecystitis;
Technical demanding;
Complication prevention
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2011;17(10):820-822
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the technical difficulties and the avoidance of complications in delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC).MethodsThe results of LC carried out on 133 consecutive patients with AC between February 2004 and August 2008 were retrospectively studied.The outcomes were compared between patients who received LC for AC within 72 hours (the early group) and those after 72 hours (the delayed group).There were 34 patients in the early group and 99 in the delayed group.During LC,Calot's triangle was carefully dissected,and the relationship of the cystic duct to the CBD and common hepatic duct was clearly identified.Retrograde cholecystectomy in 2 patients was used when the Calot's triangle was poorly identified.Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy was carried out in 4 patients whose inflammation or fibrosis precluded dissection of the Calot's triangle.ResultsThere was no conversion to open cholecystectomy,biliary tract injury,biliary leak,or any other intraoperative or postoperative complications.There was no 30day readmission in the 2 groups.Patients who received delayed LC had a significantly longer operation time [(44.1±5.32) vs (66.4±3.05)rnin,P＜0.01].There was no significant difference in wound infection rates in the 2 groups (1/34 2.94 ％ vs 2/99 2.02 ％,P＞0.05).ConclusionsDelayed LC was as feasible and safe as early LC in the treatment of AC.Delayed LC was technically more demanding than early LC.
