Comparison of clinical outcomes between microsurgical lumbar discectomy and microendoscopic discectomy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2011.10.026
- VernacularTitle:手术显微镜下与椎间盘镜下治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较研究
- Author:
Shunan YE
;
Shuhua YANG
;
Zengwu SHAO
;
Cao YANG
;
Weihua XU
;
Jianxiang LIU
;
Yong GAO
;
Liming XIONG
;
Yong FENG
;
Bo ZHANG
;
Bing GUO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Lumbar vertebrae;
Endoscopy;
Intervertebral disk displacement;
Diskectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2011;31(10):1138-1143
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo make a comparison between microsurgical lumbar discectomy(MSLD) and microendoscopic discectomy(MED) in terms of methods,feathers,and effectiveness for lumbar disc herniation (LDH).MethodsA prospective clinical review was conducted.From January 2006 to December 2009,900patients with single segment lumber disc herniation were randomly divided into the MSLD group and the MED group.There were 450 patients in each group.Comparison would be made in terms of the length of skin incision,the operative time,amount of bleeding,incidence of complication,duration of hospitalization,the time of recovery to ordinary work or life,pre- and post-operative assessment based on the criteria of visual analogue scales (VAS),and the Oswestry disability index(ODI).ResultsThe mean lengths of skin incision were (3.8±1.1) cm and (2.4±0.7) cm for MSLD and MED respectively; the operative time were (51.0±14.2) min and (62.0±16.3) min; and the blood loss were (60±35) ml and (106±43) ml,which showed a significant difference(P＜0.05).There was no significant differences in terms of the hospitalization time and the time of recovery to ordinary work or life between the two groups (P＞0.05).The results of VAS and ODI of two groups also showed no significant difference at final follow-up (P＞0.05).As for the complications,the incidence of dural tear,acute hematomas of sacrospinalis,nerve roots and cauda equina injury and recurrence in MSLD group were much lower than that of MED group (P＜0.01).There was no incidence of wrong segment,greater artery injury,or postoperative infection in each group.ConclusionThe clinical effects of both minimal invasive methods are satisfactory.However,MSLD has advantages of simpler maneuvering,shorter learning curve,and less complication than MED.
