Application value of percentage of pulmonary perfusion defect scores in predicting risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2011.09.003
- VernacularTitle:肺灌注缺损百分数在急性肺栓塞危险分层中的价值探讨
- Author:
Changhui XIE
;
Zhihai MA
;
Xiujiang LI
;
Lin ZHU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pulmonary embolism;
Pulmonary artery;
Perfusion;
Risk assessment;
Prognosis
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2011;13(9):1161-1164
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical value of percentage of pulmonary perfusion defect score ( PPDs％ ) for risk stratification and prognosis evaluation in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE).Methods A retrospective study was carried out on PPDs％ data of patients( n =21 ) with confirmed APE from January 2001 to December 2008.The patients were divided into three levels,low( n =10),medial( n =7) and high risk groups( n =4),according to 2008 ESC APE diagnosis and treatment guidelines.The reference index in predicting risk stratification by PPDs％ was ascertained.34 patients with confirmed APE were divided into three levels ( mild,moderate and severe risk levels) according to the standard of PPDS％ diagnosis from January 2009 to June 2011.A prospective study on the incidence rate of the clinical adverse events was performed.Results The PPDs％ of low,medial and high risk levels according to 2008 ESC guidelines were (25.94 ± 3.95 ) ％,(45.63 ± 4.38 ) ％ and ( 58.42 ± 4.96 ) ％ respectively,with a significant difference ( t ≥4.755,P ＜ 0.01 ).The standard of PPDS％ diagnosis for risk stratification was confirmed in APE:low risk levels:PPDs％ ＜ 30％,moderate:30％ ≤ PPDs％ ＜50％,and high:PPDs％ ≥50％.The mild,moderate and severe risk patients with APE were 17cases,11cases and 6cases respectively,according to the standard of PPDs％ diagnosis,or 15cases,13cases and 6cases respectiveldy,according to the standard of 2008 ESC guidelines.The uniform rate was 94.11％ for two methods; the uniform rate was 100.00％ in which high risk of APE.The mild,moderate and severe risk patients with APE according to the standard of PPDs％ standard with clinical adverse events for were 1case (5.89％ ),3cases (27.27％ ) and 4cases (66.67％ ) respectively,with a significant difference ( x2 =9.23,P ＜0.01 ).Conclusions PPDs％ could be used as an important reference index for risk stratification of diagnosis,selecting therapeutic programs,evaluating therapeutic efficiency and predicting the prognosis in patients with APE.
