Perioperative efficacy on radical resection of rectal carcinoma: a comparafive analysis of laparoscopy with open approach
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4203.2011.10.007
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与开腹手术围手术期疗效分析
- Author:
Juntao LI
;
Chuyuan HONG
;
Xiangcai ZOU
;
Yiwen DENG
;
Guojian LIANG
;
Jiansheng LIN
;
Jimin ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopy;
Open approach operation;
Peri-operative period
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2011;38(10):666-671
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of the radical resection by laparoscopy versus open approach in perioperative period on the patients with rectal carcinoma,and investigate the feasibility,safety and oncological clearance of the laparoscopy.Methods The clinical data of 44 patients who underwent radical resection of rectal carcinoma by laparoscopy in our hospital were reviewed and compared with another 53patients who underwent an open approach in the same period.The surgery-related data,postoperative recovery status,tumor radical resection index,and postoperative complications by laparoscopy were analyzed by statistics,and compared with those by open approach,and evaluated the deference of too kinds of operation.Results This study showed a longer surgical time (260.45 ± 67.46) min vs ( 179.25 ± 40.92) min,P ＜0.05,a less intra-operative blood loss( 125.20 ±61.80) mL vs ( 198.02 ± 131.24) mL,P ＜0.05,in laparoscopic group compared with open approach.Meanwhile,it also showed an earlier recovery of bowel functions for discharge gas from anus,taking in food,and out-of-bed activity (4.34 ± 1.55) d vs(5.45 ± 1.55) d,P ＜0.05,in the laparoscopic group compared with open approach.There was no statistical difference of incidence of post-operative complications (5 cases vs 11 cases,P ＞0.05) between the two groups and the laparoscopic approach was also equal to the open approach as regard to post-operative stay (15.34 ±6.62) d vs (16.82±5.73) d,P ＞0.05,and demand of intra-operative blood transfusion (4 case vs 8 cases,P＞0.05 ).Conclusions Compared with open surgery,the radical resection of rectal carcinoma by laparoscopy has shown obvious advantages in smaller incision,less blood loss,less pain,earlier recovery of bowel and bladder functions,and earlier out-of-bed activity.And it is also possible by laparoscopy approach to decrease the post-operative complications and post-operative stay.Meanwhile,there is no significant deference on oncological clearance for laparoscopy compared with open approach during perioperative period,while the long term follow-up data is still needed to support the results.
