Comparative study of different bandaging and hemostasis methods after percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2011.26.048
- VernacularTitle:经股动脉介入术后不同包扎止血方法的比较研究
- Author:
Yunying ZHOU
;
Linfeng LI
;
Xiaoshu YIN
;
Lang HONC
;
Hong WANG
;
Qiulin YIN
;
Bin LI
;
Qin HUANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Femoral artery;
Intervention operation;
Hemostatic measures
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2011;27(26):11-12
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and superiority of dressings and bandage compression method for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery.MethodsA total of 648 patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery were randomly divided into three groups: the modified group (224 cases), the routine group (213 cases) and the haemostat group (211 cases), they each adopted modified dressings and bandage compression method, the traditional oppression hemostatic method, and arterial oppression with hemostat method. The unarmed oppression time, expenditure, braking time, and complications were observed and analyzed statistically.ResultsThere was no significant difference in braking time and local vascular complications of the three groups. Compared with the routine group, the modified group reduced the unarmed oppression time and the medical staffs workload; compared with the hemostat group, it reduced the expenditure.ConclusionsImproved dressings and bandage compression method can reduce the unarmed oppression time and expenditure, it is an ideal local hemostasis method for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery, and is worthy of clinical application.
