The clinical results of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through the Wiltse approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2011.09.001
- VernacularTitle:Wiltse 人路经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎峡部裂性滑脱
- Author:
Yanping ZHENG
;
Xinyu LIU
;
Suonao YUAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Spondylolisthesis;
Spinal fusion;
Muscular atrophy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2011;31(9):921-926
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo assess the clinical value of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) through the Wiltse approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods Sixty-nine patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were randomly divided into two groups. Group A underwent minimally invasive TLIF via the Wiltse approach, Group B via the traditional approach. There were 31 cases in group A, the affected level was L4.5 in 19 cases and L5S1 in 12. The degree of vertebrae slippage was Ⅰ degree in 17 cases,and Ⅱ degree in 14. There were 38 cases in group B, the affected level was L4,5 in 22 cases and L5S1 in 16. The degree of vertebrae slippage was Ⅰ in 21 cases, and Ⅱ in 17. The Japanese Orthopaedics Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and leg pain were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. The post-operative dynamic X-rays, CT and/or MRI were used for image evaluation. ResultsThere was no statistically difference in operating time between the two groups. The incision length, blood loss and exposing time of group A were shorter than those of group B. The JOA scores, recovery rate, VAS of low back pain and leg pain, interbody fusion rate and atrophy rate of multifidus in group A were 24.7±3.5, 77.0％±3.1％, 1.0±0.7, 1.1±0.3, 71.0％±5.8％, 2.1±0.2, respectively, and in group B were 24.3±2.8, 73.6％±6.4％, 3.1±0.6, 1.8±0.5, 76.3％±6.1％, 0.5±0.1, respectively. The VAS of low back pain was lower in group A than in group B. The atrophy rate was better in group A than in group B. Conclusion Both TLIF approaches can acquire satisfactory clinical results. Minimally invasive TLIF through the Wiltse approach can significantly reduced damage of multifidus and incidence of chronic low back pain postoperative.
