Effects of nutritional intervention and individualized nursing on nutritional risk, undernutrition, and quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients with peritoneal dialysis: a randomized controlled study
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2011.04.002
- VernacularTitle:营养干预及个体化护理对终末期肾病腹膜透析患者营养风险、营养不良及生存质量影响的随机对照研究
- Author:
Xiaorong ZHOU
;
Kang YU
;
Qinqin TANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
End-stage renal disease;
Peritoneal dialysis;
Nutritional intervention;
Nursing;
Quality of life
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition
2011;19(4):222-226
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of nutritional intervention and individualized nursing on nutritional risk, undernutrition and quality of life (QOL) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with peritoneal dialysis. MethodsA total of 104 ESRD patients with peritoneal dialysis who met the inclusion criteria of the protocol were enrolled and randomized to receive nutritional intervention plus individualized nursing ( study group, n =52 analyzed) or self-diet plus routine nursing ( control group, n =50 analyzed) for 6 months. Nutritional risk, anthropometry, and QOL of the two groups were analyzed pre- and post-nutritional intervention. ResultsBaseline data were comparable in the two groups. Prevalences of nutritional risk and undernutrition in study group were significant lower than those in control group after the intervention ( nutritional risk: 32.6％ vs. 56.0％, P =0.028 ;undernutrition: 15.4％ vs. 34.0％, P =0.038). The decrease of grip strength in study group between pre- and post-study was significantly less than that in control group [( - 1.6 ± 0.9 ) kg vs. ( - 9.9 ± 1.4 ) kg, P =0.001], but there were no significant differences in other parameters related to anthropometry, including triceps skin-fold thickness, upper arm circumference, and arm muscle circumference ( all P ＞ 0.05 ). The QOL score significantly increased in study group after intervention but decreased in control group. The differences of renal disease and dialysis-related scores ( △KDTA: 2.5 ± 4.4 vs.- 7.9 ± 7.4, P =0.001 ) and general condition scores (△SF-36 : 3.4 ±4.1 vs.- 6.8 ± 6.3, P =0.001 ) before and after intervention were significantly different between two groups. ConclusionNutrition intervention and individualized nursing may help to improve the nutritional status and QOL in ESRD patients with peritoneal dialysis.
