Research in reliability and validity of the Chinese version of conditions of learning effectiveness questionnaire

VernacularTitle:中文版护生临床学习效能条件量表的信效度研究
Author: Yanhui LIU ; Xiaoyuan CAO ; Shanshan WANG
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: Students; Nursing; Clinical clerkship; Reliability; Validity
From: Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2011;27(22):73-75
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Objective To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Conditions of Learning Effectiveness Questionnaire (CLEQ). Methods To translate and revise the Chinese version of CLEQ. A total of 176 baccalaureate nursing students were surveyed by the Chinese version of CLEQ and the results about the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CLEQ were assessed. Results Cronbach's α of the total Chinese version of CLEQ was 0.956. Cronbach's α of four subscales were all over 0.70. The internal consistency was good. The reliability of Split half was 0.926 and retest reliability was 0.869. CVI of the four subscales were 0.91～1.00. The average CVI of the scale was 0.94. There were significant relationships among subscales. The correlation coefficient was 0.691～0.829. Four common factors were found through factor analysis, which explained the percent of 61.63% rotation sums of squared loadings. Conclusions The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CLEQ were good, so it could be used to evaluate the level of clinical learning environment among nursing students.