Timing of selective multifetal pregnancy reduction in second trimester and pregnant outcomes
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2012.10.008
- VernacularTitle:多胎妊娠选择性减胎术的时机对妊娠结局的影响
- Author:
Yan LIU
;
Xietong WANG
;
Hongyan LI
;
Haiyan HOU
;
Hong WANG
;
Yanyun WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pregnancy,multiple;
Pregnancy reduction,multifetal;
Pregnancy outcome;
Twins
- From:
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
2012;15(10):605-609
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR)performed at different gestational ages,and to analyze the influence on pregnancy outcomes.Methods Data of 302 women with multifetal pregnancies conceived after assisted reproductive technology (ART) from January 2002 to February 2012 in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University were collected and divided into two groups.The study group involved 152 multifetal pregnancy cases (triplets or quadruplets),which were further divided into three subgroups according to the timing of MFPR to twins,12-13 +6 (n=91),14-15+6(n=32) and 16-24+6 gestational weeks (n=29).The control group involved 150 twin pregnancy cases.MFPR was performed by trans abdominal intra cardiac injection of 10％ potassium chloride (KCl) solution under ultrasound guidance.Gestational age of delivery,birth weight,incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) were analyzed by t test,one-way ANOVA or Chi-square test.Results Pregnancy loss rate of the study group (14.5％,22/152) was higher than that (6.7％,10/150) of control group,x2=4.857,P＜0.05.Pregnancy loss rate of the subgroup undergoing MFPR during 16-24+6 gestational weeks (31.0％,9/29) was higher than that during 12-13 +6 gestational weeks (8.8％,8/91,x2=7.212,P＜0.05) and that of control group (x2=12.749,P＜0.05).There were no differences in pregnancy loss rate between control group and MFPR during 12-13+6 gestational weeks (x2=0.370,P＞0.05),and during 14-15+6 gestational weeks (15.6％,5/32,x2 =1.739,P＞0.05).No statistically significant difference was found between the study group and control group in mean gcstational age at delivery[(36.9±l.8) weeksvs (37.0±1.8) weeks,t =-0.346,P＞0.05],mean birth weight of large babies [(2720.4±455.0) g vs (2729.1±413.8) g,t =-0.163,P＞0.05] and small babies [(2409.2±412.6) g vs (2416.2±436.8) g,t=-0.136,P＞0.05].There were no differences between the study group and control group in delivery rate at 28-34 gestational weeks [6.2％ (8/130)vs6.4％ (9/140),x2 =0.009,P＞0.05],birth weight discordance rate [12.3％ (16/130) vs11.4％ (16/140),x2=0.050,P＞0.05],GDMrate[3.1％ (4/130) vs2.1％ (3/140),x2 =0.659,P＞0.05] and HDCP rate [11.5％ (15/130) vs 8.6％ (12/140),x2 =0.010,P＞0.05].Conclusions There is risk of pregnancy loss after MFPR,but MFPR before 16 weeks of gestation might decrease the risk.
