Possible effects of enteral nutrition for diabetes mellitus compared with blend diet on length of hospital stay etc of critically ill patients
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2012.05.005
- VernacularTitle:糖尿病型肠内营养剂与匀浆膳对重症患者住院时间等的影响
- Author:
Aiqin MA
;
Ling PAN
;
Zongwei GAO
;
Qin ZHU
;
Man WANG
;
Huanlong QIN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Enteral nutrition;
Hyperglycemia;
Critically ill;
Outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition
2012;20(5):285-290
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effects of enteral nutrition (EN) for diabetes mellitus on the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with hyperglycemia.Methods Sixty-four critically il1 patients with hyperglycemia were randomly divided into the control group and intervention group.The control group was given homemade homogenized meals and the study group was given EN for diabetes mellitus.Both were given the same total energy and nitrogen content.EN was applied 3 days after ICU admission and then lasted 14 days.Blood glucose was controled at 6.1-8.5 mmol/L by insulin therapy.No albumin,blood plasma,or parenteral nutrition was provided to all patients.The lactulose mannitol ratio,biochemical indicators,total insulin dosage,and short-term and longterm outcomes were analyzed before and after EN support.The quality of life was evaluated using Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale.Results Finally 59 patients were enrolled in the study,with 30 in the intervention group and 29 in the control group.The lactulose mannitol ratios in the intervenion group were significantly lower than those in the control group 7 days (0.221 ±0.117 vs.0.299 ±0.154,t =-2.199,P =0.032) and 14 days (0.169 ±0.122 vs.0.305 ±0.129,t =-4.191,P =0.000) after EN support.Meanwhile,the total insulin dosages were also significantly less in the intervention group [7 days,(195 ± 54) vs.(227 ± 60) U ; t =-2.096,P =0.041 ;14 days,(392 ±114) vs.(459 ±118) U; t =-2.221,P =0.030].Compared with the control group,the intervention group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation [(8.00 ± 1.75) d vs.(6.73 ±2.05) d,t=-2.547,P=0.014] and ICU stay[(10.00±1.95) vs.(8.80±2.17) d,t=-2.233,P=0.030],lower total hospitalization expenses [(56 238.39 ± 17 869.61) vs.(70 395.63 ±20 111.69) Yuan,t =-2.861,P =0.006],and faster recovery of daily activities [(17.59 ± 3.21) vs.(35.34 ± 8.65) scores,t =10.030,P =0.000] and living quality of life [(22.67 ± 4.51) vs.(40.55 ± 8.88) scores,t =9.397,P =0.000] after 90 days of treatment.Conclusion The EN for diabetes mellitus may improve the outcomes of critically ill patients with hyperglycemia compared with blend diet.
