The clinical value of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2012.29.002
- VernacularTitle:荧光原位杂交在尿路上皮癌诊断中的临床应用价值
- Author:
Wenqi WU
;
Zhenhua ZHAO
;
Yeping LIANG
;
Lili OU
;
Shujue LI
;
Guohua ZENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
In situ hybridization,fluorescence;
Urologic neoplasms;
Endoscopes;
Biopsy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2012;35(29):3-5
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical value of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma.MethodsFrom September 2010 to October 2011,morning voiding urine of 27 patients with suspected urothelial carcinoma was collected for FISH examination.The results of FISH examination were compared with the results of pathological examination by endoscopic biopsy.Both sensitivity and specificity were compared respectively,and the cost of each kind of examination was also considered.ResultsOf 27 cases,pathological examination by endoscopic biopsy revealed 11 cases of urothelial carcinoma,FISH examination showed 9 cases of urothelial carcinoma,but only 7 cases in these 11 cases.The overall sensitivity of FISH examination was 63.6％ (7/11 ),the specificity was 87.5％(14/16).The cost per case of FISH examination (3100 yuan) was 3.1 times of pathological examination by endoscopic biopsy( 1000 yuan).ConclusionsIt showed that there is no advantage of FISH examination for diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma considering both the sensitivity and specificity,and the cost is also higher than that of pathological examination by endoscopic biopsy.It should be evaluated further when FISH examination is widely used in clinic.
