Evaluation of an in-house method for HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping test
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-9158.2011.09.018
- VernacularTitle:对in-house HIV-1基因型耐药性检测方法的评价
- Author:
Qingmao GENG
;
Hanping LI
;
Tianyi XIN
;
Daomin ZHUANG
;
Zuoyi BAO
;
Yongjian LIU
;
Lin LI
;
Zheng WANG
;
Siyang LIU
;
Jingyun LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
HIV-1;
Genotype;
Drug resistance,viral;
Microbial sensitivity tests
- From:
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2011;34(9):849-854
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of an in-house detecting method of HIV-1 genotypic drug resistance system. MethodsTotally 130 serum specimens from Henan and Guangxi province were collected from April 2004 to October 2008 and tested in the Military HIV Testing Center of China. ViroSeqTM v2.0 (Abbott, Switzerland), a US FDA approved HIV genotypic drug resistance detecting system was utilized as the reference method. All the specimens were detected by the novel in-house method and the reference method to validate the difference in amplifying efficiency, drug resistance mutation detection and drug resistance report. ResultsConcerning the 14 850 known drug resistance mutation sites,14 752 (99. 3％ ) mutations can be detected by both of the two methods. Rates of concordance of detection in the regions of protease inhibitors-, reverse transcriptase inhibitors- and both two classes inhibitors-resistance were99.7％ ( Kappa =0. 909 9 , P ＜0. 01 ) , 99. 0％ (Kappa=0.952 1, P＜0. 01) and99.3％ (Kappa=0. 948 8, P ＜ 0. 01 ) respectively. Drug resistance reports from these two systems showed similar results (Kappa = 0. 637 4, P ＜ 0. 01 ). The in-house detecting system identified 34 novel mutations besides the ViroSeqTM drug resistance mutation database ( ViroSeqTM software v2. 7). Two mutations, V179F and K238T,had significant effect on HIV drug resistance. ConclusionsThe in-house genotyping system is an accurate,cost-effective method and has a high concordance with commercial ViroSeqTM genotyping system. Database from the in-house assay was superior to this of the ViroSeqTM assay.
