Clinical study of intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis with urokinase for acute cerebral infarction
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2012.13.007
- VernacularTitle:尿激酶动静脉联合溶栓治疗急性脑梗死临床研究
- Author:
Zhaochen LI
;
Fuying YU
;
Lijun HUANG
;
Jianliang GE
;
Chengshi CAI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Brain infarction;
Urinary plasminogen activator;
Thrombolytic therapy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2012;35(13):20-23
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis with urokinase for acute cerebral infarction.Methods Fifty patients with acute cerebral infarction occurred within 6 hours were divided into two groups by random digits table method with 25 cases each:intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis group and intravenous thrombolysis group.The patients in intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis group were given 200 000 U urokinase by intravenous infusion for 30 minutes immediately after being hospitalized,and arterial thrombolysis was prepared at the same time.With cerebrovascular angiography,the thrombolytic therapy was carried out in the target vessel blocking points through micro-catheter.Urokinase dissolved in 0.9％ sodium chloride was infused at the rate of 10 000 U per minute,the total volume would not be more than 1 000 000 U.The patients in intravenous thrombolysis group were given 1 000 000 U urokinase in 100 ml 0.9％ sodium chloride by intravenous infusion within 60 minutes.The clinical efficacy after thrombolysis was assessed according to the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score,the quality of life was judged by Barthel index (BI) score and the prognosis was evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 90 days after thrombolysis.ResultsThere was no significant difference between two groups before thrombolysis according to the NIHSS score (P ＞ 0.05).After thrombolysis,NIHSS scores in two groups showed a downward trend,but they were obviously lower in intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis group after 24 h,7 d and 14 d than those in intravenous thrombolysis group [(8.97±4.56) scores vs.(11.01±3.65) scores,(6.88±2.31) scores vs.(8.34±3.05) scores,( 4.06±3.02 ) scores vs.( 6.73±2.15 ) scores ] ( P ＜ 0.05 or ＜ 0.01 ).BI scores before thrombolysis between two groups had no significant difference(P ＞0.05),while BI score of 90 days after thrombolysis in intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis group [(79.55±19.64) scores] was higher than that in intravenous thrombolysis group [(69.31±21.35) scores](P=0.0162).The rate of mRS score 0-2 (good efficscy) in intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis group [72.0％(18/25) ] was obviously higher than that in intravenous thrombolysis group [ 52.0％ ( 13/25 ) ] (P =0.0198 ).ConclusionsIt is significantly effective to treat acute cerebral infarction by superselective intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis.Therefore,it is supposed to be an optimal option for treating acute cerebral infarction in the future.
