Comparison of the clinical effects between the two-level ladder ultrafiltration and sequential dialysis for the hemodialysis patients with excessive water retention
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2012.05.010
- VernacularTitle:二水平阶梯超滤与序贯透析用于血液透析过多水潴留患者的临床效果比较
- Author:
Zhenhua JIANG
;
Yuqing REN
;
Xirong YANG
;
Penpyuan LIANG
;
Guanmao SHI
;
Junli YANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Two-level ladder ultrafiltration;
Sequential dialysis;
Water retention;
Hemodialysis
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2012;28(5):483-487
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects between the two-level ladder ultrafiltration and sequential dialysis for hemodialysis patients with excessive water retention.Methods According to our hospital standard,23 patients with water retention during treatment with dialysis from January 2010 to September 2011 were selected.And they conducted a total of 198 dialysis.Both the two-level of high-level segment and sequential ultrafiltration step dialysis were set for 1 hour.Ultrafiltration accounted for one-third of the total,and the remaining two-thirds of the amount of ultrafiltration was completed in the remaining time.The blood pressure,ultrafiltration volume completed,plasma osmotic pressure,detection of vascular access pressure,and other observed indicators during dialysis were compared.Results The occurrence of hypotension and muscle spasms in two-level ladder ultrafiltration was slightly more than that in sequential dialysis,ultrafiltration volume completed actually in two-level ladder ultrafiltration was a little less than sequential dialysis.However,the difference was not statistically significant ( P ＞ 0.05 ).It took more time during sequential dialysis simple ultrafiltration,occasionally dialysis fluid stopped flowing and dialyzer and the trail tube lack of incubation,and some patients could not adapt to it.Amount of heparin( [7.48 ± 1.73 ] mg/h vs[6.25 ± 1.36] mg/h,t =5.374,P ＜ 0.01 ),venous pressure ( [ 128.62 ± 10.53 ] mm Hg vs [ 96.35 ± 11.84 ] mm Hg,t =20.166,P ＜ 0.01 ),trausmembrane pressure( [ 236.84 ± 23.65 ] mm Hg vs [ 175.94 ± 24.72] mm Hg,t =17.516,P ＜ 0.01 ) were significantly higher than those in the high level of ultrafiltration period.Mean arterial pressure ( MAP ) ( [ 100.48 ± 5.78 ] mm Hg vs [ 102.54 ± 5.39 ] mm Hg,t =2.571,P ＜ 0.05 ) and plasma osmotic pressure ( [ 311.42 ± 7.36] mOsm/( kg · H2O ) vs [ 3 1 7.31 ± 6.89 ] mOsm/( kg · H2O ),t =5.774,P ＜ 0.01 ) in high level period were significantly lower than those in the singal ultrafiltration period,and the MAP difference was higher than that in the singal ultrafiltration period ( [ 11.46 ± 6.53 ] mm Hg vs [ 9.42 ± 5.46 ] mm Hg,t =2.385,P ＜ 0.05 ).There is less symptomatic hypotension and other adverse reactions.Conclusion Two dialysis ultrafiltration method can both be used for patients with excessive water retention,they can reduce the ultrafiltraion complications and achieve ultrafiltration targets.Two-level ladder ultrafiltration with dialysis and ultra.filtration unity is more likely to be adopted by the clinic.
