Compare the myocardial protection effect of HTK solution with blood cardioplegic solution during valve replacement surgery
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2012.03.014
- VernacularTitle:HTK液与含血停搏液对瓣膜置换术中心肌保护的研究
- Author:
Nan ZHANG
;
Nan GUO
;
Chuanming BAI
;
Shutian SONG
;
Jiewu ZHOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cardioplegic solutions/TU;
Organ preservation solutions/TU;
Heart valve prosthesis implantation;
Cardiomyopathies/TH
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2012;14(3):339-341
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effect of HTK solution on myocardial protection during valve replacement surgery.Methods 42 patients with rheumatic heart disease were randomized to receive 4∶1cold blood (control group,n =21 ) and HTK ( protective gronp,n =21 ) cardioplegic solution during valve replacement.The changes of CO and CI were collected at different time points including pre-operation,postoperative 6 hours,12 hours and 24 hours.Aortic clamping time,the ratio of spontaneous cardiac rhythm recovery and inotropic drugs application were calculated,and mechanical ventilation support time and the incidence of arrhythmia were recorded.Results The measurements of CO and CI showed that there was significant higher level in protective group at postoperative 12 hours and 24 hours [ 12 h:(4.82 ± 0.18 ) L/min vs ( 3.50 ± 0.32 ) L/min,( 3.80 ± 0.48 ) L/( min · m2 ) vs (2.79 ± 0.39) L/( min · m2 ) ;24 h:(4.97±0.45)L/min vs ( 3.81 ±0.19)L/min,(4.22±0.17)L/(min · m2) vs (2.91 ±0.21)L/(min·m2 ),P < 0.05].The clinical parameters including aortic clamping time,incidence of cardiac arrhythmia,inotropic support,duration of mechanical ventilation and length was lower than in control group [ (53.6 ±24.3 ) min vs ( 68.9 ± 26.1 ) min ; ( 1.8 ± 1.3 ) min vs ( 2.3 ± 1.2 ) min ; ( 33 ± 11 ) min vs ( 42 ± 13 ) min ;(10.2±2.1) μg/(kg · min) vs (15.7 ±3.8) μg/(kg · min);(14.6 ±4.8)h vs (20.7 ±5.1)h,P <0.05].The auto-beating rate was higher than in control group (90% vs 67%,P <0.05).Conclusions HTK solution is better than classical blood cardioplegia in myocardial protection during valve replacement.