A comparison of three different curative therapies for early-intermediate stage primary liver cancer analysis of 428 cases
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2011.05.008
- VernacularTitle:早-中期原发性肝癌三种不同治疗方法的疗效比较:附428例分析
- Author:
Chuanyun LI
;
Shichun LU
;
Wei LAI
;
Yuan LIU
;
Daobing ZENG
;
Qingliang GUO
;
Dongdong LIN
;
Jushan WU
;
Menglong WANG
;
Ning LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Liver carcinoma;
Hepatectomy;
Radio-frequency ablation;
Liver transplantation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2011;17(5):376-379
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the curative results of three different therapies for earlyintermediate stage primary liver cancer. Methods The data of 428 patients with early-intermediate stage primary liver cancer treated with one of three curative therapies from April 2004 to July 2010 in our center were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided non-randomly into three groups: group A liver-cancer resection (n = 231), group B radio-frequency ablation (RFA) (n = 63), and group C liver transplantation (n=134). The 1-, 3-, 5-year accululative survival and recurrence rate in each group were compared. Results The accumulative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 93.3%, 71.9%, 57.2% for group A; 86.7%, 46.5%, 38.8% for group B; 95.7%, 78.3%, 72.1% for group C,respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-year recurrence rates were 30. 3% , 49. 7%, 68. 6% for group A; 39. 3% , 58. 7% , 79. 3% for group B; 7. 0% , 12. 1% , 12. 1% for group C,respectively. There was a highly significant difference between groups A, B and C in the survival rates and the recurrence rates. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher for group C than group A and group B (P<0. 01, P<0. 001), and the recurrence rate of 1, 3, 5-years were significantly lower for group C than for group A and B (P<0. 001). Conclusion Liver transplantation was the most effective therapy for the early-intermediate stage primary liver cancer.
