Comparisons of Unicortical and Bicortical Lateral Mass Screws in the Cervical Spine: Safety vs Strength.
- Author:
Choon Keun PARK
1
;
Jang Hoe HWANG
;
Chul JI
;
Jae Un LEE
;
Jae Hoon SUNG
;
Seung Jin CHOI
;
Sang Won LEE
;
Eric SEYBOLD
;
Sung Chan PARK
;
Kyung Suok CHO
;
Chun Kun PARK
;
Joon Ki KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Unicortical;
Bicortical;
Lateral mass screw;
Strength, Safety
- MeSH:
Adult;
Cadaver;
Cervical Vertebrae;
Female;
Humans;
Incidence;
Spinal Cord;
Spine*;
Vertebral Artery;
Zygapophyseal Joint
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2001;30(10):1210-1219
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze the safety, pullout strength and radiographic characteristics of unicortical and bicortical screws of cervical facet within cadaveric specimens and evaluate the influence of level of training on the positioning of these screws. METHODS: Twenty-one cadavers, mean 78.9 years of age, underwent bilateral placement of 3.5mm AO lateral mass screw from C3-C6(n=168) using a slight variation of the Magerl technique. Intraoperative imaging was not used. The right side(unicortical) utilized only 14mm screws(effective length of 11mm) while on the left side to determine the length of the screw after the ventral cortex had been drilled. Three spine surgeons(attending, fellow, chief resident) with varying levels of spine training performed the procedure on seven cadavers each. All spines were harvested and lateral radiographs were taken. Individual cervical vertebrae were carefully dissected and then axial radiographs were taken. The screws were evaluated clinically and radiographically for their safety. Screws were graded clinically for their safety with respect to the spinal cord, facet joint, nerve root and vertebral artery. The grades consisted of the following categories: "satisfactory", "at risk" and "direct injury". Each screw was also graded according to its zone placement. Screw position was quantified by measuring a sagittal angle from the lateral radiograph and an axial angle from the axial radiograph. Pull-out force was determined for all screws using a material testing machine. RESULTS: Dissection revealed that fifteen screws on the left side actually had only unicortical and not bicortical purchase as intended. The majority of screws(92.8%) were satisfactory in terms of safety. There were no injuries to the spinal cord. On the right side(unicortical), 98.9% of the screws were "satisfactory" and on the left side(bicortical) 68.1% were "satisfactory". There was a 5.8% incidence of direct arterial injury and a 17.4% incidence of direct nerve root injury with the bicortical screws. There were no "direct injuries" with the unicortical screws for the nerve root or vertebral artery. The unicortical screws had a 21.4% incidence of direct injury of the facet joint, while the bicortical screws had a 21.7% incidence. The majority of "direct injury" of bicortical screws were placed by the surgeon with the least experience. The performance of the resident surgeon was significantly different from the attending or fellow(p<0.05) in terms of safety of the nerve root and vertebral artery. The attending's performance was significantly better than the resident or fellow(p<0.05) in terms of safety of the facet joint. There was no relationship between the safety of a screw and its zone placement. The axial deviation angle measured 23.5+/-6.6 degrees and 19.8+/-7.9 degrees for the unicortical and bicortical screws, respectively. The resident surgeon had a significantly lower angle than the attending or fellow(p<0.05). The sagittal angle measured 66.3+/-7.0 degrees and 62.3+/-7.9 degrees for the unicortical and bicortical screws, respectively. The attending had a significantly lower sagittal angle than the fellow or resident(p<0.05). Thirty-three screws that entered the facet joint were tested for pull-out strength but excluded from the data because they were not lateral mass screws per-se and had deviated substantially from the intended final trajectory. The mean pull-out force for all screws was 542.9+/-296.6N. There was no statistically significant difference between the pull-out force for unicortical(519.9+/-286.9N) and bicortical(565.2+/-306N) screws. There was no significant difference in pull-out strengths with respect to zone placement. CONCLUSION: It is our belief that the risk associated with bicortical purchase mandates formal spine training if it is to be done safely and accurately. Unicortical screws are safer regardless of level of training. It is apparent that 14mm lateral mass screws placed in a supero-lateral trajectory in the adult cervical spine provide an equivalent strength with a much lower risk of injury than the longer bicortical screws placed in a similar orientation.
