Single-port transumbilical laparoendoscopic nephrectomy: Initial clinical experience of 20 cases
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2011.02.002
- VernacularTitle:经脐单孔多通道腹腔镜下肾切除术20例报告
- Author:
Linhui WANG
;
Bing LIU
;
Fubo WANG
;
Zhenjie WU
;
Qing YANG
;
Wenbin LUO
;
Rui LUO
;
Min WEI
;
Liang XIAO
;
Yinghao SUN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopy;
Single-port;
Nephrectomy;
Transumbilical
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2011;32(2):79-82
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To summarize the clincical experience of transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-site (LESS) nephrectomy and to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods From December 2008 to August 2010, we have performed 20 cases of transumbilical LESS nephrectomy by Tri-Port system, of which 9 patients underwent LESS radical nephrectomy (left 8, right 1, stage T1 ), 1 patient underwent LESS radical resection of right ureteral carcinoma, 10 patients underwent LESS simple nephrectomy (left 5, right 5). The Tri-Port system was inserted transperitoneally through a 2 cm umbilical incision. A 5-mm 30° telescope was introduced through the port to visualize the operative field. Flexible equipment and standard laparoscopic equipment were used to perform the procedures.The incisions were extended to about 6cm in order to remove the specimens. Results Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one LESS radical resection of right ureteral carcinoma and one LESS simple nephrectomy, while the remaining 18 cases were successful (the addition of a single 5-mm port was necessary in 2 cases of LESS radical nephrectomy). The mean operative time was 197 min (85-510 min), mean estimated blood loss was 126 ml (50-400 ml), without blood transfusion in the perioperative period, mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.3 d (3-14 d), and mean duration of catheter drainage was 3.6 d (0- 14 d). Conclusions Transumbilical LESS nephrectomy is feasible, safe,minimally invasive and cosmetic. Long-term follow-up and a clinical control study are needed for evaluating clinical outcomes.
