Standardized management and assessment of prenatal ultrasound screening
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2011.03.012
- VernacularTitle:产前超声筛查技术规范化管理与效果评价
- Author:
Hongyan XU
;
Kaibo LIU
;
Ming YAN
;
Quan GONG
;
Ying YU
;
Ying PAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography,prenatal;
Congenital abnormalities;
Evaluation studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
2011;14(3):170-173
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effect of standardized training and management of prenatal ultrasound screening on birth defects. Methods According to the degree of standardized training and management of prenatal ultrasound screening, the period from March 2004 to December 2009 were divided into three different management stages. Detection rate was applied to describe the prenatal ultrasound screening of 5199 birth defects cases delivered during the three different management stages. Accuracy rate was used to describe the ultrasonographic diagnosis made by staffs in 2009. SPSS 11.5 software was used to analyze the information of 707 staffs participated in the training and assessment activities from October 2007 to September 2009. Related factors of prenatal ultrasound operating skills of staffs were analyzed by comparing the distributing discrepancy of the different variables between qualified and unqualified group with Chi-square test. Results The detection rate of prenatal ultrasonographic screening on birth defects increased with the improvement of training and assessment methods, which was 32. 43% from March 2004 to September 2005,44.81% from October 2005 to September 2007 and 60. 71% from October 2007 to December 2009respectively. In 2009, 187 doctors were tested on abnormal ultrasound photographs identification. The accurate rates were 80. 0% for gastroschisis, 78. 8% for cleft clip, 75.8% for omphalocele, 71.8%for neural tube defects, 50. 0% for severe congenital heart diseases, 31.0% for acromicria, which were in similar sequence as the diagnostic rate identified by prenatal ultrasound in 2009. Among the staffs attending the prenatal ultrasound screening assessment, more had education background at least university level (52.8% vs 47.2%), more performed ≥50 ultrasound screenings per month (50. 5%vs 49.5 % ), more had been working on obstetric ultrasound over 3 yrs (52.5 % vs 47.5 %) and more had been trained in higher level of hospitals focused on prenatal diagnosis (64.7% vs 35.3%) in the qualified group than in the unqualified group. Conclusions Standardized training and management of prenatal ultrasonographic screening could effectively improve the diagnosis rate of birth defects.The quality of prenatal ultrasound screening is related to the staff's education background and whether they are engaged in the position.
