Comparison of different radical resection of renal pelvis carcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2011.03.013
- VernacularTitle:不同根治手术在肾盂癌治疗中的比较
- Author:
Xilu WANG
;
Hailong HU
;
Changli WU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Kidney neoplasms;
Kidney pelvis;
Laparoscopy;
Nephrectomy
- From:
Cancer Research and Clinic
2011;23(3):185-187
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the surgical technique and clinical effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with transurethral bladder-cuff excision and open nephroureterectomy in pelvis carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analysed the records of all 62 patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic or open nephroureterectomy in Tianjin Dagang Hospital or the Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from July 2001 to July 2009. Variables analyse were compared including operative time, blood loss, turning to open operation, complications, length of stay, tumor recurrence and metastasis. Groups were compared using Student's t-test, and a probability (P) value of less than 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. Results The respective mean operative duration [(47.34±39.16) vs (118.17±44.65) ml], length of hospital stay [(9.15±2.19) vs (11.64±3.71) d], time to ambulation [(3.58±0.79) vs (5.67±1.24) d]and blood loss [(70.64±27.33) vs (118.17±44.65) ml]in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with transurethral bladder-cuff excision group was significantly reduce to open nephroureterectomy group (t = 3.3167, 2.0587, 8.0494, 5.1777, P ＜0.05). There was no significantly difference between two groups in complication of during operation and post operation [4.8 % (2/42) vs 5.0 %(1/20), 0 vs 0, respectively](P ＞0.05). 4 cases were failed and conversed to open surgery in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy group. During the follow up period range from 8-48 months, there was no significantly difference between two groups in tumor recurrence and metastasis [4.8 % (2/42) vs 5.0 % (1/20),2.4 % (1/42) vs 5.0 % (1/20), respectively](P ＞0.05). Conclusion Retroperitoneal laparoscopy in upper urinary tract transitional carcinoma uses a small incision, incurs less blood loss, and allows for a more rapid recovery, suggesting it is a safe and effective method for treating patients with renal and pelvis cancer.
