Comparison of Angioseal closure device with manual compression
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2011.14.015
- VernacularTitle:股动脉穿刺术后Angioseal血管封堵与压迫止血的对比
- Author:
Jianhu LIN
;
Jun SUN
;
Chuan LU
;
Xiandong CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cerebral angiography;
Femoral artery;
Punctures;
Hemostasis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2011;34(14):37-39
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To assess the safety and efficiency of Angioseal device in patients undergoing percutaneous femoral artery puncture in brain angiograph or interventional therapy. Methods A prospective trial was carried out in 128 patients undergoing brain angiograph and interventional therapy,in which 93undergoing brain angiography and 35 interventionsl therapy. All patients were divided into pure compression group by manual compression (83 cases) and vascular blocking group by Angioseal device (45 cases)according to different hemostatic measures. Results In angiography, hemostasis time of vascular blocking group and pure compression group was (1.8 ±0.8) min and(20.2 ±9.4) min (P＜0.01 ),ambulation time was (3.8 ± 0.8) h and (19.4 ± 2.2) h (P ＜ 0.01). In interventional therapy,hemostasis time of vascular blocking group and pure compression group was (2.0 ± 1.1) min and (24.5 ± 10.3) min (P ＜ 0.01), ambulation time was (4.3 ± 1.5) h and (24.3 ± 3.2) h (P＜ 0.01). Pure compression group had higher complication rate (such as bleeding,hematoma,skin ulceration and blister) than vascular blocking group (P＜0.01).Conclusion Angioseal closure device is safe, efficient and easy to use.
