Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
- Author:
Hyung Soo CHOI
1
;
Gyu Tae KIM
;
Yong Suk CHOI
;
Eui Hwan HWANG
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
tomography, cone beam computed;
Panoramic radiography;
Mandibular nerve;
Molar, third
- MeSH:
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Humans;
Mandibular Nerve;
Molar, Third;
Prevalence;
Radiography, Panoramic
- From:Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
2008;38(3):169-176
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and value in an imaging technique field through the comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants consisted of 100 patients offered the images through cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography. PSR-9000(TM) Dental CT system (Asahi Roentgen Ind. Co., Ltd, Japan) was used as the unit of cone beam computed tomography. CE-II (Asahi Roentgen Ind. Co., Ltd, Japan) and Pro Max (Planmeca Oy, Finland) were used as the unit of panoramic radiography. The images obtained through panoramic radiography were classified into 3 types according to the distance between mandibular canal and root of mandibular third molar. And they were classified into 4 types according to the proximity of radiographic feature. The images obtained through cone beam computed tomography based on the classification above were classified into 4 types according to the location between the mandibular canal and the root and were analyzed. And they were classified into buccal, inferior, lingual, and between roots, according to the location between mandibular canal and root. The data were statistically analyzed and estimated by chi-square-test. RESULTS: 1. There was no statistical significance according to 3 types (type l, type ll, type lll) through CBCT. 2. The results of 4 types (type A, type B, type C, type D) through CBCT were as high prevalence of CBCT 1 in type A, CBCT 2 in type B, CBCT 3 in type C, and CBCT1 in type D and those of which showed statistical significance (P value=0.03). 3. The results according to location between mandibular canal and root through CBCT recorded each 49, 25, 17, 9 as buccal, inferior, lingual, between roots. CONCLUSION: When estimating the mandibular canal and the roots through the panoramic radiography, it could be difficult to drive the views of which this estimation was considerable. Thus it is required to have an accurate diagnostic approaching through CBCT that could estimate the location between mandibular canal and roots.
