Lower Loading Dose of Prasugrel Compared with Conventional Loading Doses of Clopidogrel and Prasugrel in Korean Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating Pharmacodynamic Efficacy.
10.4070/kcj.2014.44.6.386
- Author:
Dong Hyun LEE
1
;
Moo Hyun KIM
;
Long Zhe GUO
;
Min Kyu PARK
;
So Jeong YI
Author Information
1. Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea. kimmh@dau.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Randomized Controlled Trial ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Prasugrel;
Clopidogrel;
Platelet function tests;
Population heterogeneity;
Coronary artery disease
- MeSH:
Asian Continental Ancestry Group;
Blood Platelets;
Coronary Angiography*;
Coronary Artery Disease;
Electrodes;
Humans;
Platelet Function Tests;
Population Characteristics;
Prasugrel Hydrochloride
- From:Korean Circulation Journal
2014;44(6):386-393
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although prasugrel allows for rapid and potent platelet inhibition, the efficacy and safety of lower doses of prasugrel for patients of East Asian ethnicity has not yet been investigated. We compared the effect of a lower loading dose (LD) of prasugrel with conventional LDs of clopidogrel and prasugrel in Korean patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-three Korean patients undergoing coronary angiography were enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly administered LDs of clopidogrel 600 mg, prasugrel 30 mg or prasugrel 60 mg prior to coronary angiography. Platelet reactivity was assessed at baseline and at the time of peak platelet inhibition using light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow assay, and multiple electrode aggregometry. RESULTS: Although baseline platelet reactivity between the groups showed no significant differences, at the time of peak platelet inhibition, the prasugrel 30 mg (18.9+/-10.0%) and 60 mg groups (13.8+/-10.8%) showed significantly more potent platelet inhibition than the clopidogrel 600 mg group (52.9+/-15.8%; p<0.001) by LTA. However, there were no significant differences between the prasugrel 30 mg and 60 mg groups (p=0.549). CONCLUSION: The loading effect of prasugrel 30 mg was more potent than clopidogrel 600 mg and was not significantly different from prasugrel 60 mg.
