Translational medicine related tools for quality assessments of clinical trials and the trial reports
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2011.01.001
- VernacularTitle:与转化医学有关的临床研究质量及研究报告质量的评价工具
- Author:
Yanwu ZHANG
;
Zhuming JIANG
;
Yang WANG
;
Bin ZHANG
;
Tiejun HU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Translational medicine;
Quality assessment of clinical trials;
Quality assessment of trial reports;
Jadad scale;
Schulz approach to allocation concealment;
Risk of bias tool;
Newcastle-Ottawa scale
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition
2011;19(1):1-6
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective and fair clinical trials are the main methods for assessing the clinical significances of the experimental findings. The development of translational medicine highly relies on high-quality clinical trials as well as trial reports. Although the definition of"quality of clinical trials"and"quality of trial reports"differs from each other, they are closely related and can be consistent in most circumstance in the context of"scientific integrity". The quality of trial reports can be basically assessed by their internal and external properties. The quality of a randomized trial can be assessed by Jadad scale and Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias, and the quality of a non-randomized trial by risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. However, since Jadad scale lacks appropriate appraisal of allocation concealment and is too simple in evaluating blind method, assessment of allocation concealment should be added. A more widely accepted approach for assessing the quality of random trials is the combination of Jadad scale and Schulz's approach to allocation concealment till recent years.For non-randomized cohort studies and case-control studies, Newcastle-Ottawa scale might be suitable at present time.
