Application of enteral nutritional emulsion (TPF-D) or enteral nutritional emulsion (TP) in patients with chronic wound and diabetes
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2011.01.006
- VernacularTitle:含缓释淀粉和不含缓释淀粉的肠内营养制剂用于慢性创面合并糖尿病患者营养支持效果的比较
- Author:
Peng TIAN
;
Yeping ZHOU
;
Wei DENG
;
Weili DU
;
Guoan ZHANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Enteral nutritional emulsion (TPF-D);
Enteral nutritional emulsion (TP);
Chronic wound;
Diabetes;
Nutritional support
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition
2011;19(1):22-24
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effectiveness of enteral nutritional emulsion (TPF-D) and enteral nutritional emulsion (TP) in patients with chronic wound and diabetes (CWD). Methods Totally 20 CWD patients in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from June 2008 to June 2010 were enrolled in this study. Enteral nutritional emulsion (TP) was used for the first 5 days ( TP group) and enteral nutritional emulsion (TPF-D) was used for the second 5 days (TPF-D group). Changes of mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), insulin dosage, and prealbumin (PA) were compared between TPF-D group and TP group. The adverse effects and post-operational complications were also observed. Results The every-day MAGE was (2. 56 ±0. 35) mmol/L in TPF-D group, which was significantly lower than that in TP group [ (3.23 ± 0. 42) mmol/L] ( P = 0. 01 ). The mean insulin dosage was (9.6 ± 1.7) U in TPF-D group, which was significantly lower than that in TP group [ ( 12. 2 ± 2. 5 ) U ] ( P =0.03 ). The increase of PA showed no significant difference between TPF-D group [ ( 12.7 ± 3. 3) mg/L] and TP group [ ( 13.4 ± 2. 8 ) mg/L ] ( P = 0. 08 ). No enteral nutrition-related adverse effect or post-operation complication was noted. Conclusion Compared with TP, TPF-D is more suitable for the CWD patients.
