The Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Three Therapeutic Schemes for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections
- VernacularTitle:3种治疗下呼吸道感染方案的成本—效果分析
- Author:
Yulan LIU
;
Zuojun LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
China Pharmacy
2001;12(2):92-94
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infections.METHODS:The cost-effectiveness analysis of three therapeutic schemes for lower respiratory tract infections was carried out.RESULTS:The cost-effectiveness ratio of penicillin-piperacillin schemes(L1)was minimum in respect to the effective rate.However,the cost-effectiveness ratios had no significant difference between cefotaxime scheme(L3)and L1 scheme in regard to cure rate(P>0.05),the cost-effectiveness ratio of ciprofloxacin-clinadmacin scheme(L2) was higher significantly than those of L1 and L3 schemes(P<0.05,both schemes).CONCLUSION： L1 is the best therapeutic scheme.Although L3 scheme had higher cost,it had higher cure rate and lower ADRs occurrence.L3 scheme is benefitial to improvement of patient's life quality.
