Protection of the effective fraction of Hibiscus Mutabilis L. against injury of renal ischemic reperfusion in rats
- VernacularTitle:木芙蓉叶有效组分对大鼠肾缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用
- Author:
Shicong FU
;
Shihua LUO
;
Fenghua ZHANG
;
Lingzhu ZHOU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2005;9(6):250-251
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Hibiscus Mutabilis L. Is a very effective Chinese traditional herb for non-specific inflammation in the clinic adopted by Professor Wei Zhixin, the eminent expert in Traumatology Department in China, lasting for near 60 years. In order to explain its pharmaceutical mechanism, the research of Hibiscus Mutabilis L. Was carried on in the model of ischemic reperfusion injury to explain its mechanism on anti-inflammation.OBJECTIVE: To observe the protection of the effective fraction of Hibiscus Mutabilis L. (MFR) on renal ischemic reperfusion injury in rats to probe into the mechanism of MFR on anti-inflammation.DESIGN: Randomized and controlled study on experimental animal.SETTING: A Municipal Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Department.MATERIALS: The experiment was performed in the Key Experiment Room (Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Department, Shanghai) of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, in which, 55 male Wistar rats were employed.METHODS: The rat model of renal ischemic reperfusion was adopted and MFR was applied for gastric perfusion to determine serum blood urea nitrogen(BUN) and serum creatinine(Scr) and the level of interleukin-1 (IL-1).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ① Changes in serum BUN and Scr; ②Effect of MFR on level of serum IL-1.RESULTS: After MFR treatment, the renal function was improved remarkably after ischemic reperfusion in rats. In sham-operation group, serun BUN was (6.72 ± 1.30) mmol/L and serum Scr was (38.40 ± 6.23) μmol/L. In 24hours of reperfusion after one-hour ischemia, BUN was(60. 72±4.64)mmol/L in the control and(47.34 ± 8.32) mmol/L in the MFR treatment group, and the significant difference presented between two groups(t=2.562, P ＜ 0.05) .Serum Scr was(347.95±95) μmol/L and(518.20 ± 41.15) μmol/L in the treatment group and the control respectively, indicating significant difference ( t = 3.69, P ＜ 0.01 ) . Concerning to the effect on IL-1, in 1 hour of reperfusion after 1 hour renal ischemia,IL-1 was( 122.79 ±27.56) ng/L in the MER treatment group,(180. 28 ±33. 15) ng/L in the control group, indicating that IL-1 level in the treatment group was remarkably superior to that in the control group(t = 2.98, P ＜ 0.05). In 3 hours of reperfusion after 1 hour ischemia, level of IL-1 in the treatment group and control group was(15.58±8.59) ng/L and (34. 13±± 10. 02) ng/L respectively, indicating significant difference( t = 3.14, P＜ 0.05).CONCLUSION: MFR provides protection on renal ischemic reperfusion injury, which probably is related to its inhibition on IL-1 formation.
