A survey on the use of composite resin in Class II restoration in Korea.
10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.087
- Author:
Dong Ho SHIN
1
;
Se Eun PARK
;
In Seok YANG
;
Juhea CHANG
;
In Bog LEE
;
Byeong Hoon CHO
;
Ho Hyun SON
Author Information
1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. hhson@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Korean dentist;
E-mail survey;
Class II cavity restoration;
Composite resin;
Adhesive dentistry
- MeSH:
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate;
Chicago;
Composite Resins;
Congresses as Topic;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Dentists;
Electronic Mail;
Humans;
Inlays;
Korea;
Lectures;
Male;
Polyethylene Terephthalates;
Postal Service;
Rubber Dams;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
2009;34(2):87-94
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to assess the current materials, methods and difficulties according to the year of licence and educational background of Korean dentists in Class II direct composite resin restorations. Total 17 questions were included in the questionnaire. Questions were broadly divided into two parts; first, operator's information, and second, the materials and methods used in Class II posterior composite restoration. The questionnaire was sent to dentists enrolled in Korean Dental Association via e-mail. Total 12,193 e-mails were distributed to dentists, 2,612 e-mails were opened, and 840 mails (32.2%) were received from respondents. The data was statically analyzed by chi-square test using SPSS(v. 12.0.1, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Male dentists among respondents was 79%. 60.3% of the respondents acquired their licences recently (1998-2007), and 77% practiced in private offices. 83.4% have acquired their knowledge through school lectures, conferences and seminars. For the Class II restorations, gold inlays were preferred by 65.7% of respondents, while direct composite resin restorations were used by 12.1% amalgam users were only 4.4% of respondents. For the restorative technique, 74.4% of respondents didn't use rubber dam as needed. For the matrix, mylar strip (53.4%), metal matrix (33.8%) and Palodent system (6.5%) were used. 99.6% of respondents restored the Class II cavity by incremental layering. Obtaining of the tight interproximal contact was considered as the most difficult procedure (57.2%) followed by field isolation (21%). Among various bonding systems, 22.6% of respondents preferred SE Bond and 20.2% used Single Bond. Z-250 was used most frequently among a variety of composite resins.
