Accuracy and Frequency of Citation of References from the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology - From the first application of the present contribution rules (1996) to 1998 -.
10.4097/kjae.1999.37.5.877
- Author:
Yong Chul KIM
1
;
Sang Yoon CHO
;
Jong Hoon YEOM
;
Woo Jong SHIN
;
Jong Hun JUN
;
Dong Ho LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Publication, Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, references
- MeSH:
Anesthesiology*;
Incidence
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
1999;37(5):877-884
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of and errors in citation of references in articles from the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology (KJA) from the first application of the present contribution rules (1996) to 1998 and to suggest a clue to improve the quality of our journal. METHODS: All references cited from KJA were reviewed using a computerized searching system. If any differences are found during the review, we compare it with the original article. Errors on the contribution rules were examined according to the instructions for the authors revised in 1995. RESULTS: Overall 74% of the articles had more than one reference cited from KJA. The average number of the references cited from KJA per article was 1.73. In such references, citation errors were found in 48% of articles published in 1996, 44% in 1997, and 43% in 1998. The percentages of general errors and errors involving the contribution rules were 62% and 38%, respectively. Common general errors were found in titles (164 cases), pages (102 cases), and name (60 cases). Those involving the contribution rules found in the notation of name (120 cases), pages (54 cases), and inadequate notation of the number of issue (49 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Despite numerous efforts, the incidence of citation errors was still high when the articles of KJA were cited as references. Improvement in the quality of our journal will be possible only by rigid adherence to contribution rules, thorough review of the articles, and a lucid explanation of contribution rules.
