A comparison study on the respiratory symptoms between patients receiving low-to-mid flow humidified and dry oxygen by nasal cannula
10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2010.01.011
- VernacularTitle:湿化与未湿化中低流量鼻导管吸氧患者呼吸道症状的观察
- Author:
Long LI
;
Wei WANG
;
Genmei WANG
;
Zan LIU
;
Yugui LIN
;
Shaofang WU
;
Yan CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Humidification;
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Nursing
2010;45(1):31-32
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of humidification of oxygen delivered by nasal cannula on the respiratory symptoms. Method A total of 540 patients receiving low-to-mid flow oxygen therapy (<4L/min) by nasal cannula for more than 12 hours were assigned to receive humidified (n=235) or dry (n=305)oxygen. While 226 patients receiving a low-to-mid flow oxygen therapy for more than 24 hours received humidified or dry oxygen respectively. The patients' respiratory symptoms were observed and recorded. Results Dryness over naso-pharyngeal region was the only symptom reported by patients in this study. There was no significant difference on the rate of dryness over naso-pharyngeal region between patients receiving humidified oxygen and patients receiving dry oxygen (P>0.05) either in the same patients when receiving dry and humidified oxygen (P>0.05). Conclusion Routine humidification is not necessary in low-to-mid flow oxygen therapy by nasal cannula.