Posterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: Comparison with posterolateral fusion
10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2009.52.014
- VernacularTitle:椎间融合与环周融合结合椎弓根钉内固定置入治疗成人腰椎滑脱:效果优于后外侧融合吗?
- Author:
Chao WEI
;
Huilin YANG
;
Genlin WANG
;
Liang CHEN
;
Chong ZHOU
;
Taibao XIA
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
2009;13(52):10274-10278
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the therapeutic effect of surgical approach that should be used for posterior interbody fusion,posterolateral fusion with or without lumbar interbody fusion for adult spondylolisthesis.METHODS:From January 2004 to May 2008,75 patients with adult spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed,comprising 22 males and 33 females,aged 53.3 years (ranging 49-70 years).There were 47 cases in L4,28 in L5;5 cases of degree Ⅰ,24 of degree Ⅱ,37 cases of degree Ⅲ,and 9 of degree Ⅳ.A total of 21 patients were treated with pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral lumbar fusion (group A),26 with pedicle screw fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cage (group B),and 28 with pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral lumbar fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cage.The satisfaction rate and fusion rate were compared among the three groups.RESULTS:All 75 patients were followed up for 6 months 3 years.The fusion rate of group A was 57%,and the satisfaction rate was 62%;the fusion rate of group B was 85%,and the satisfaction rate was 89%;the fusion rate of group C was 89%,and the satisfaction rate was 93%.There were no significant differences in the satisfaction rate and fusion rate between groups B and C (P>0.05),but the satisfaction rate and fusion rate of groups B and C were superior over group A (P<0.05).CONCLUSION:Posterior interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion with lumbar interbody fusion display similar treatment effects,which are better than posterolateral fusion.
