A study on the comparability of SCID-Ⅱ and PDQ-4
- VernacularTitle:人格障碍定式临床会谈量表(第2版)与人格诊断问卷对比分析
- Author:
Yunfei DAI
;
Zeping XIAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Mental health;
Personality disorder;
SCID-Ⅱ 2.0;
PDQ-4
- From:Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2008;17(5):468-469
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the comparability of two personality diagnostic instruments(SCID-Ⅱ and PDQ-4)in psychiatric patients. Methods One hundred and twelve mental disorder patients were investigated with the SCID-Ⅱ and PDQ-4. Results 1)Significant differences were found between groups(dividing by total scores on PDQ-4)by means of SCID-Ⅱ interviews(P＜0. 0 1). 2)Categorical personality disorder(PD)groups by means of SCID-Ⅱ interviews had hisher scores on PDQ-4 than their related non-PD groups. 3)For agreement on categorical diagnoses between SCID-Ⅱ and PDQ-4, the correlation coefficients varied from 0. 17 to 0. 57. Except for antisocial PD(r=0. 57), the others had poor-fair coefficients, as r＜0. 50. Conclusions In general, there is some correlation between SCID-Ⅱ and PDQ-4. Low agreement between PDQ-4 and SCID-Ⅱ is observed for categorical PD evaluations. Thus, PDQ-4 can't be a substitute tool for SCID-Ⅱ.
