Analysis of analgesics administration from July 2005 to July 2006 in multicenter emergency rooms in Shenyang area
- VernacularTitle:2005年7月至2006年7月沈阳地区多中心急诊镇痛药使用情况分析
- Author:
Xuesong DONG
;
Zhi LIU
;
Xinping JI
;
Mengwei WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Emergencies;
Analgesics;
Narcotic analgesics;
Pain management
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2008;17(6):650-653
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze analgesics administration from July 2005 to July 2006 in emergency rooms of the First, the Second and Fourth Affiliated Hospitals of China Medical University in order to provide a reference for clinically rational administration. Method The data of 2313 prescriptions with analgesics administered during one-year period were analyzed in many respects including the overview of the prescriptions, the frequency of anal-gesics administration, the system of defined daily doses (DDDs) and drug utilization index (DUI) of narcotic anal-gesics were analyzed, and a survey of 200 patients managed with some of those analgesics was done by using ques-tionaire as they were admitted to and discharged from the emergency room. The pain intensity was evaluated by a 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The respondents, excluding the mute or deaf, police custody, victims of domestic violence,mental disorder and age under 14,rated the levels of satisfaction with medication for pain relief. The data of frequency and percentage of the administration of analgeics were analyzed,and the scores of NRS were evaluated with the Paired-samples t -test. Results Most of analgesics were in the form of parenteral route usage, of which anisodamine and bucinnazine were employed in large proportion, and a small number of them was in the form of tablets. Trauma was the commonest cause of pain. Of the narcotic analgesics, meperidine was the most com-monly used analgesics, and its DDDs and DUI were much lower than that of WHO limits. Of the 200 patients, 71.5% patients rated a considerably high satisfaction with scores of (7.47 ±2.21) and (5.00 ± 3. 16) by NRS before and after medication,respectively ( ( -value 23.38,P < 0.01) .The patients presenting pain intensity with a scores of 4 or greater accounted for 57.5% . Conclusions The patients suffering from pain could lie rationally treated in the emergency rooms of those three hospitals. Narcotic analgesics should be cautiously employed, and there is room for improvement in pain management practice in emergency room.
