The contrast of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids between the local anesthesia and the combined spinal epidural anesthesia
- VernacularTitle:局部麻醉和蛛网膜下腔联合硬膜外麻醉下行吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术的对比观察
- Author:
Longbin XIAO
;
Fengfeng XU
;
Liang DENG
;
Shuo LONG
;
Wenhui WU
;
Shouzhi LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hemorrhoids;
Anesthesia,local;
Anesthesia,epidural;
Surgical procedures,operative
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2008;31(23):27-29
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) treating for Ⅲand Ⅳ degree hemorrhoid under the local anesthesia.Methods One hundred and fifty patients with Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree hemorrhoid were divided into two groups randomly.One group was the local anesthesia group (LA group) which included 73 cases,the other one was the combined spinal epidural anesthesia group (CSE group) which included 77 cases.Compared the safety and efficacy of different procedure.Results The original symptom of the two groups were improved.There was a significant difference in the time of hospitalization time and the hospitalization expense between the two groups (P＜0.05).The LA group was(4.8±1.1)days with(3980±639)yuan,and the CSE group was(6.8±1.1) days with(5128±728)yuan.The rates of two groups of urine retention were 9.6% and 24.7% (P＜0.05) after the operation respectively,and there were no significant differences in recovery normal activity time,the pain index,copracrasia and pruritus,the bleed,the anal fistula,the prolapse of hemorrhoid,the skin tag (P ＞0.05).Conclusion PPH under the local anesthesia is safe,compare to the combined spinal epidural anesthesia,it excels in shortening the hospitalization time and reducing the hospitalization expense,also it can reduce significantly the rate of urine retention after operation.
