Study on carotid intima-media thickness and stiffness in type 2 diabetic patients
- VernacularTitle:2型糖尿病患者颈动脉内中膜厚度和硬化度
- Author:
Yanping LIU
;
Weiwei ZHAN
;
Yanyan LIN
;
Ying ZHU
;
Xinping REN
;
Yifei ZHANG
;
Yuhong CHEN
;
Xiaoying LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Arterial stiffness;
Carotid intima-media thickness;
Diabetes mellitus,type 2
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
2008;24(4):391-393
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of blood glucose level and duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and quantitative carotid stiffness (QCS) in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods Two hundred and seventy-four type 2 diabetic patients (diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria) were involved in this study. The subjects were divided into three groups according to the HbAlclevels and duration of diabetes mellitus: 60 with duration ≤2 years (as newly diagnosed) , 96 with duration≥5 years and HbAlc <6.5%, and 118 with duration≥5 years and HbAlc≥6.5%. CIMT and QCS of the common carotid artery were assessed by the high-resolution B-mode ultrasound unit and an echo-tracking system integrated in an uhrasound unit respectively. Results (1) In categorical analyses, the mean level of CIMT was increased from 720 μm in subjects with a duration of diabetes mellitus ≤2 years to 770 μm in subjects with a duration of diabetes mellitus > 2 years and plasma HbAlc< 6.5% (P < 0.05), and to 800 μm in subjects with a duration of diabetes mellitus > 5 years and plasma HbAlc≥ 6.5 % (P < 0.01). The corresponding values for Q CS values were 4.5, 4.5 and 5.1 (P <0.05), respectively. (2) In multiple stepwise regression analyses, CIMT wassignificantly associated with the duration of diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure and serum concentration of total cholesterol, whereas QCS was significantly associated with age, duration of diabetes mellitus, smoking, HbAlc, systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Conclusion QCS is suitable in evaluating the impact of blood glucose on carotid artery, while CIMT is an appropriate tool for long-term follow-up of diabetic patients.
